FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, March 27, 2003
Merck Attempts to Hide Important Investment Facts From Shareholder Proxy Vote
Washington, DC – “It is clear from their actions, that Merck does not want their stockholders to know the truth about how they conduct their business,” said Fr. Thomas Euteneuer, president of Human Life International (HLI), a Merck & Co. stockholder. “If this is ‘ordinary business’ as Merck claims, then they wouldn’t have petitioned the Securities and Exchange Commission for permission to remove the indicting language from our stockholder proposal.”
Working with Children of God for Life and Pro Vita Advisors, HLI drafted Stockholder Proposal No. 7 which made clear -despite claims of employing, “the highest standards of ethics and integrity,” in its business practices-that Merck & Co. continues to use aborted fetal cell lines in the creation of certain vaccines. The original resolution sought to educate investors to potential business and financial repercussions related to the continued use of these cell lines. Merck sought to hide from investors that:
- Merck faces an organized boycott of all Merck products because aborted fetal cell lines are used in vaccines;
- The Catholic Medical Association (CMA) passed a resolution to use alternatives to Merck’s and other drug companies vaccines that are cultivated from aborted fetal cell lines;
- Pro Vita Advisors, an investment counseling organization, advises investors to divest their Merck stock because of its continued use of aborted fetal cell lines
In a five-page letter, Merck originally pleaded with the SEC to keep the entire resolution off the company’s proxy vote, but failed at that effort. Merck did succeed, however, in convincing the SEC to remove the language that would have informed voters of these potential risks. Merck has refused to acknowledge that they profit from the destruction of human life despite the fact that $34.6 million of their $7.2 billion net income for 2002 was from viral vaccine sales.
Debi Vinnedge, executive director of Children of God for Life, stated, “We believe stockholders have a right to know these types of details about a company in which they are investing. If that company is subject to boycotts, investment warnings and resolutions like the one from the CMA, it could suffer a severe loss in sales and devaluation in stock.”
To view the Merck Prox: http://www.merck.com/finance/proxy/pr2003/proposal_4.html
Is risedronate sodium or actonel tested or derived from aborted fetal cells.
Andrew, the Tdap shots are ethically developed, tested and produced. There's a note at the bottom of the chart informing…
Anyone know about ethics and safety of Tdap for older kids and adults? I did not see it on the…
Thank you very much. I greatly appreciate your help and all the great work you do. God bless you all,…
Andrea, Paxlovid does not contain fetal cells. Aborted fetal cell lines were used in preclinical testing and were an essential…
I have Covid and my doctor has prescribed Paxlovid. I read that the development was compromised, but does the actual…
Chris, I sent a link to your email. You should have it shortly.
The link has disappeared. Where can I find the new updated ethical flu shot list for 2023-2024? Thank you.
Thank you kindly Jose for your help! Could you help me with one more …..Tamoxifen - for breast cancer? Does…
This is a reasonable rule of thumb, but there are exceptions. The poliomyelitis and rubella vaccines are examples of exceptions.…
Yvie, there is no comprehensive list, and this is due to the sheer number of approved drugs that are available.…
So, is it safe to say that if a medication is FDA approved before 1977 when fetal cell lines started…
Is there a list of medications that are abortion tainted? I'm in severe pain with fibromyalgia and am trying to…
Virginia, I have researched the development history of this drug and found no association with aborted fetal cell lines or…
Cefalexin was developed in 1967. This places its development prior to the advent of fetal cell lines in medical research.…